Retired Gen. Gordon R. Sullivan
Chief of Staff of the Army, 1991-1995
Seventy years ago, the thought of a woman
training for active combat would have been unthinkable. Although women had
just started serving as active members of the U.S. Armed Forces in World War II, after its completion they mostly
left the military.
This was the norm after war—only women
nurses were allowed to serve in the military during peacetime, and the hundreds
of thousands of women who had served their country during World War II were
expected to walk away from their military service and rejoin civilian life. But
in 1948, that all changed when women took an essential first step toward
becoming equal members of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Women have always had a
role in United States’ military conflicts. Women (known as "camp followers) followed the
Continental Army, performing tasks such as washerwomen, cooks, medical
caregivers and other services sometimes including prostitution.
In the Revolutionary
War nurses presided over massive hospitals and worked to feed and clothe
soldiers.
Only during World War I
could women, who were not nurses, enlist in the armed forces during wartime.
Though most women still served in a voluntary capacity, a select few were hired
by different military branches and put to work in clerical positions.
World War II created an unprecedented need
for soldiers—and dramatically changed the military’s non-combat ranks. In an
effort, to free up men to fight on the front lines, the armed forces recruited
women for non-combat positions like linguists, weather forecasters and
telephone operators.
At first, the Army only accepted women on an
auxiliary, temporary basis through the Women's Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC). But as the war continued, recruiting
became more difficult. "Higher paying jobs in civilian industry, unequal
benefits with men, and attitudes within the Army itself—which had existed as an
overwhelmingly male institution from the beginning—were factors,” the U.S.
Army notes.
In an attempt, to stop the bleeding,
Congress, urged on by U.S. Representative Edith Nourse Rogers, decided to allow
women to actually enlist in the Army of the United States (essentially the
reserves). With the creation of the Women’s Army Corps, or WAC, in 1943, women
could now attain military rank and serve overseas. Meanwhile, the WAAC stayed
active, too. Women served in record numbers in both branches, performing their
duties with distinction. WACs received the same pay, benefits and rank as their
male counterparts; other military branches followed suit with groups like the
WAVES (U.S. Navy) and SPARS (U.S. Coast Guard).
But though women served valiantly in the war
effort, their work was often stigmatized and mocked. Sexual
harassment was common, as were implications that women had traded sexual favors
for their military ranks. Rumors that
the program was a Nazi plot to undermine the armed forces were common, and some
men resented having to serve alongside women.
Women served bravely in World War II, even
becoming prisoners of war and receiving medals and citations for their
contributions. But once the war ended, they found themselves jobless and
unrecognized. Many employers discriminated against women who had served in the
military, convinced that their service had involved sexual immorality or
nepotism and certain that they would want to subvert gender roles in the
workplace.
Those who had stayed in auxiliary
roles weren't considered veterans or given benefits, though they had served in
critical roles during the war. And even WACs and WAVES who were given the same
veterans’ benefits as men assumed that they’d be kicked out of their roles
during peacetime, as had happened after every other war. Women knew that during
peacetime, only nurses could serve.
But the toughness and efficiency of the
women who served in the U.S. Military during World War II had convinced
officials in all branches that it was worth employing women. First, auxiliary
members and WACs were provided re-employment rights by Congress in 1946,
forcing employers to allow them to return to their prewar jobs. (WAACs wouldn’t
be made eligible for Veterans’ Administration services until 1980.)
Then, the U.S. Army, convinced it couldn’t
afford to let go of the women who had served with such distinction during war, asked
Congress to allow them to make WACs a permanent part of their ranks. In 1948,
President Truman signed the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act into law.
The act let women serve as full, permanent members of all of the branches of
the military.
Women were finally able to serve their
country as members of the U.S. Armed Forces during peacetime. But, in reality,
the act severely restricted their service. It limited the number of women who
could serve to 2 percent of any military branch, allowed the military to
involuntarily discharge women who became pregnant, and it limited the number of
women who could become officers. Most significantly, it prevented women from
commanding men or ever serving in combat.
"A prime objection [to integrating women
into regular service] which we were told was discussed in closed sessions, was
that if women were in the regular military, men would have to take orders from
a woman. Heaven forbid,”recalled Mary A. Hallaren, who began her career in the U.S.
Army as a WAAC and eventually became a Colonel.
It would take decades for the restrictions
to change, but women were finally able to participate in the armed forces
during peacetime, if unequally. Though discrimination reigned in all branches
of the military—at the beginning of the Vietnam War, for example, the
Department of Defense authorized nearly
300,000 men they deemed of "low aptitude” to enlist rather than expand women’s
roles—women continued to serve bravely and
persistently.
Slowly, women’s roles expanded. In 1970,
women were finally allowed to rise to command roles in non-combat units, and
women and men began training together.
In 2013, women achieved full status in the military when they were granted the right to serve in direct ground combat roles. That milestone then raised the issue of whether women should, like men, be required to register for the draft. In February 2019, a U.S. District judge ruled that requiring all men to register for a military draft, while excluding women, is considered unconstitutional.
Why be behind when you could be in front?”
an unnamed woman, newly promoted to Army private, asked the Army Times' Meghann
Myers in 2017. She was one of the first women to join the U.S. Army’s infantry,
undergoing grueling training along with male recruits and preparing for the
realities of combat.